APLD

$36 billion of contracted revenue, one unnamed tenant behind half of it, and a $249 million year

APLD · Applied Digital Corporation · Equity Research Report · as of August 19, 2026

Price $28.51 Market
Market cap $8,310M Estimate
Shares out 291,469,112 Filed
Fiscal year end 31 May Filed
Pricing basis Aug 18, 2026 close Market

Framing

  1. Applied Digital has 1.4 GW of contracted critical IT load representing approximately $36B of total contracted lease revenue, or approximately $86B if all renewal options are exercised. Three of the five campus leases, 810 MW and roughly $20B of that total, are with a single customer the company describes only as a high investment-grade hyperscaler and does not name. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026
  2. The fiscal year ended May 31, 2026 produced revenue of $611.3M, up 167%, and a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $249.2M, or $(0.91) per share. Adjusted EBITDA, which excludes the separated cloud business, was $107.2M. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026 and 10-K, Jul 29, 2026
  3. Total liabilities rose to $6,185.7M at May 31, 2026 from $1,236.4M a year earlier, against total equity of $1,724.5M. Restricted cash of $2,381.0M sits beside $1,592.0M of unrestricted cash, so most of the liquidity on the balance sheet is committed. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026

01Snapshot

Key figures, each tagged by provenance.

MetricValueBasis
Revenue (FY2026, ended May 31, 2026)$611.3MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026. Up 167% on FY2025.
Revenue (FY4Q26, Mar to May 2026)$258.7MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026. Up 407% on the prior year quarter.
Net loss to common (FY2026)($249.2M)Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026. $(0.91) per basic and diluted share.
Adjusted EBITDA (FY2026)$107.2MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026. Company-defined non-GAAP measure; excludes ChronoScale.
Cash and cash equivalents (May 31, 2026)$1,592.0MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026
Restricted cash (May 31, 2026)$2,381.0MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026
Property and equipment, net (May 31, 2026)$4,236.3MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026. Was $1,252.3M a year earlier.
Total assets (May 31, 2026)$9,929.3MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026
Total liabilities (May 31, 2026)$6,185.7MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026. Was $1,236.4M a year earlier.
Total equity (May 31, 2026)$1,724.5MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026. Includes $7.0M noncontrolling interest.
Contracted critical IT load1.4 GWFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026
Live capacity, Polaris Forge 1175 MWFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026
Bitcoin hosting capacity286 MWFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026. Two North Dakota sites.
Market capitalization$8,310MEstimate 291,469,112 shares (Jul 28, 2026, Filed 10-K cover) × $28.51 (Aug 18, 2026 close, Market) = $8,309,784,383. Share count and price carry different dates, twenty-one days apart. The figure previously carried, $9,113M, did not reconcile: 291,469,112 at $31.27 is $9,114,239,132.

02Business model

Applied Digital designs, builds, owns and operates large-scale data centers for high-performance computing, and leases them whole to a small number of very large tenants. It calls the buildings AI Factories. The company describes a franchise model: a core team of design, construction and operations professionals replicated across every campus, running on a common supply chain and on design approvals from the major hyperscalers.

There are two revenue-earning businesses and they are paid on quite different terms.

AI data center leasing is the strategic business. Capacity is contracted under 15-year take-or-pay leases before it is built, then delivered in phases. Take-or-pay means the tenant owes the rent whether or not it uses the capacity, which is what makes the contracted revenue figure meaningful and what allows the build to be financed with secured notes at the project subsidiary. Five campuses are under way: Polaris Forge 1, 2 and 3, and Delta Forge 1 and 2, for two hyperscalers and CoreWeave.

Data center hosting is the legacy business and the more profitable one per dollar of assets. Applied Digital operates 286 MW across two North Dakota sites for a bitcoin mining customer. The chief executive states plainly that the company is paid for the data center capacity provided rather than for the mining output, so revenue does not move with the bitcoin price as long as the customer keeps mining. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

A third business left during the year. The cloud services operation was separated and combined with Ekso Bionics Holdings to form ChronoScale, listed on Nasdaq as CHRN. Applied Digital retains roughly 96% of the equity, so ChronoScale is still consolidated into these financial statements while being excluded from every non-GAAP measure the company presents. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

Analyst assumption

The ChronoScale arrangement is treated here as a disposal in substance that has not yet happened in form. Ninety-six percent ownership is not a separation in any economic sense, and the consolidated statements say so by consolidating it. The company's own non-GAAP presentation excludes it, which means the GAAP and adjusted figures in this document describe different groups of assets. Where a figure excludes ChronoScale, this document says so rather than letting the two bases sit side by side unlabelled.

03Revenue streams

The reported streams and, separately, the contracted book that does not appear in revenue yet.

Applied Digital's revenue nearly tripled in the fourth quarter, to $258.7M from a base 407% lower a year earlier. Almost all of that growth is the AI data center business beginning to earn rent as Polaris Forge 1 came into service. The hosting business is roughly flat and is the smaller number.

MeasureFY4Q26FY2026Basis and durability
Revenue, as reported$258.7M$611.3MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026. Includes ChronoScale.
Adjusted revenue$240.4M$539.7MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026. Excludes ChronoScale. The $71.6M full-year gap is the separated cloud business.
Adjusted EBITDA$42.4M$107.2MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026
Net operating income$39.9M$90.4MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026
Adjusted net income$12.9M$36.1MFiled 8-K, Jul 27, 2026. $0.04 and $0.11 per diluted share.
Net loss to common, as reported($110.6M)($249.2M)Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026

The distance between adjusted net income of $36.1M and a reported net loss of $249.2M is the single largest interpretive question in this company's accounts, and a reader should hold both figures rather than choosing one. The adjustments exclude ChronoScale entirely and remove items the company treats as non-recurring; the reported figure carries the financing cost of a build that is mostly not yet earning.

The contracted book

None of the following is in revenue yet, and the timing is stated by the company rather than estimated here.

CampusCritical IT loadBase-term revenueTenant and first operations
Delta Forge 1, Boyce, Louisiana300 MW~$7.5BHigh investment-grade hyperscaler, not named. Calendar year 2027.
Polaris Forge 3300 MW~$7.5BSame hyperscaler. Calendar year 2027.
Delta Forge 2, southern state not named210 MW~$5.2BSame hyperscaler, third consecutive. First half of calendar 2028.
Polaris Forge 1 and 2, and the balance~590 MW~$15.8BCoreWeave and a second hyperscaler. Polaris Forge 1 partly in service.
Total contracted1.4 GW~$36B~$86B if all renewal options are exercised. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026
Analyst assumption

The 590 MW and $15.8B in the fourth row are the residual after subtracting the three named leases from the company's stated 1.4 GW and $36B totals. Applied Digital states the totals and the three individual leases; it does not publish this breakdown, and the residual covers more than one campus and more than one tenant. It is arithmetic on filed figures, not a disclosed number, and it should not be read as the terms of any single lease.

Beyond the contracted portfolio and the roughly 1.4 GW under construction, the company states it is marketing a further 1.7 GW of capacity across multiple states. That is a marketing position rather than a contract and carries no revenue figure.

04Industry & market backdrop

Applied Digital operates in the part of the AI build-out where the scarce input is interconnected power rather than land, capital or demand. Its own commercial record is the clearest evidence of the demand side: three 15-year take-or-pay leases signed with one investment-grade hyperscaler within a few months, each in a different state, plus the earlier CoreWeave arrangements.

Two features of the market shape how the company is financed. First, tenants of this credit quality will contract capacity years before it exists, which lets a developer raise secured debt against a signed lease rather than against a completed building. Applied Digital has done exactly that: $2.15B of 6.750% senior secured notes due 2031 at APLD ComputeCo 2 for Polaris Forge 2, and $1.59B of 7.000% senior secured notes due 2031 at APLD ComputeCo 3 for the fourth building at Polaris Forge 1. Second, the tenant's own credit is part of the financing: the company enhanced credit quality on the existing CoreWeave leases through a restructured special purpose subsidiary, unconditional springing guarantees from CoreWeave and a $50M letter of credit, following what it describes as CoreWeave's investment-grade A3-rated refinancing. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

Power

The company is pursuing generation rather than waiting on the grid. It is working with Base Electron Corp., an independent power producer that has engaged Babcock & Wilcox, to develop approximately 1.2 GW of front-of-the-meter natural gas-fired generation in the Dakotas in collaboration with regional utilities. Applied Digital states its shareholders own approximately 10% of Base Electron through the company's investment. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

Analyst assumption

The phrase used in the release is that Applied Digital shareholders own approximately 10% of Base Electron through the company's investment in Base Electron. Read literally that is an indirect interest held by the company itself. This document treats it as a corporate minority investment rather than as a direct shareholder holding, because a company cannot ordinarily place an asset in its shareholders' hands without distributing it. The 10-K's treatment of the investment would settle it and was not read to that level of detail here.

05Competitive position

Named peers on comparable metrics. The relevant comparison is contracted capacity and the credit behind it, not installed megawatts.

Applied Digital's competitive position rests on one claim it can evidence and one it cannot yet. The evidenced claim is delivery: Polaris Forge 1's first 100 MW came online on schedule and live capacity at the campus has since reached 175 MW, following Ready for Service on the 75 MW first phase of Building 2. The unevidenced claim is that the franchise model replicates, which will be tested at Delta Forge 1 and Polaris Forge 3 in calendar 2027. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

CompanyComparable onWhere it differs
Galaxy Digital (GLXY)Long-term leases to a computing tenant, financed with project-level secured notes526 MW of contracted critical IT load against Applied Digital's 1.4 GW, all with one tenant; Galaxy also runs a digital asset trading business. Filed GLXY 8-K, Aug 5, 2026
IREN Limited (IREN)Owned power and self-build across multiple sitesRetains a large self-mining business; Applied Digital hosts for a miner rather than mining itself
Cipher Mining (CIFR)Converting queue positions into HPC leasesTexas-weighted; Applied Digital is in North Dakota and Louisiana with different interconnection dynamics
TeraWulf (WULF)Single-campus leasing financed with secured notesSmaller contracted book; no equivalent multi-campus franchise claim
Bitdeer (BTDR)Long-term AI/HPC colocation leasing121 MW contracted in Norway; manufactures its own mining hardware, which Applied Digital does not
Hut 8 (HUT)Power portfolio serving both mining and computingRetains a digital asset treasury; Applied Digital holds none

Against this set Applied Digital has the largest disclosed contracted book, and it is the only one in the group whose leases are described as take-or-pay with a stated investment-grade counterparty. The offsetting position is that the same counterparty stands behind three of the five campuses and is not named, so the credit cannot be independently assessed by a reader of this document.

06Financial performance

The fiscal year ends 31 May, so FY2026 covers June 2025 to May 2026. Every comparative below is a full twelve months against a full twelve months.

The trend is stated first: revenue is growing very fast, the reported loss is roughly flat, and the balance sheet has changed shape entirely. Total liabilities grew fivefold in one year while equity grew threefold, and property and equipment more than tripled.

MeasureFY2025FY2026Change
Revenue$228.6M$611.3MUp 167%, as stated by the company
Net loss to common stockholders($232.9M)($249.2M)Company states the loss deepened 7%
Loss per basic and diluted share($1.17)($0.91)Company states the per-share loss narrowed 22% on a larger share count
Cash and cash equivalents$44.0M$1,592.0MUp $1,548.0M
Restricted cash$72.4M$2,381.0MUp $2,308.7M
Property and equipment, net$1,252.3M$4,236.3MUp 238%
Total assets$1,870.1M$9,929.3MUp 431%
Total liabilities$1,236.4M$6,185.7MUp 400%
Total equity$497.7M$1,724.5MUp 247%
Accumulated deficit($481.1M)($662.3M)Deepened $181.3M

Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026, and 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2026, filed Jul 29, 2026. FY2025 revenue and loss per share are derived from the company's stated percentage changes against FY2026 and are marked below.

Analyst assumption

The FY2025 revenue of $228.6M and net loss to common of $232.9M in the first two rows are computed from the company's own stated changes, $611.3M at up 167% and $249.2M at up 7%, rather than read directly from a FY2025 column. The balance sheet rows are read directly from the comparative column at May 31, 2025. Where a growth rate and a base disagree with the prior-year statements as filed, the filed statements govern.

What the balance sheet change means

Two figures deserve attention together. Restricted cash of $2,381.0M exceeds unrestricted cash of $1,592.0M. That is the signature of construction financing: proceeds from the secured note issues sit in controlled accounts and are released against certified construction spending. It is committed money, and a liquidity read that adds the two together will overstate the company's freedom by more than $2.3B.

Against that, the loss is being carried while the assets are built. Interest on $3.74B of senior secured notes at 6.750% and 7.000%, plus the 9.250% notes due 2030, accrues now against capacity that mostly begins operating in calendar 2027 and 2028.

07Capital structure & dilution

A common equity that grew 28% in a year, two preferred series outstanding, a $2B preferred purchase facility, an at-the-market program substantially used, and $3.74B of new project-level secured notes.

Common equity

295,048,903 shares were issued and 287,883,603 outstanding at May 31, 2026, against 234,200,868 issued and 224,909,669 outstanding a year earlier: an increase of 62,973,934 outstanding shares, or 28%, in one year. Treasury stock stood at 7,165,300 shares. The 10-K cover reports 291,469,112 shares outstanding as of July 28, 2026, a further 3,585,509 since the year end. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026, and 10-K, Jul 29, 2026.

Preferred stock

SeriesOutstanding, May 31, 2026Carrying valueNote
Series E276,673$6.3M301,673 issued; classified as temporary equity
Series E-161,909$56.5M62,500 authorised and issued; temporary equity
Series GNonen/a1,030,000 authorised, none issued or outstanding at the year end

Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026. Common stock issuable to holders of Series E and E-1 on redemption is capped at 19.99% of the outstanding shares.

The preferred equity purchase agreement

Under a preferred equity purchase agreement entered on April 30, 2025, Applied Digital may issue up to $2B of Series G convertible preferred stock at its option, through the earlier of August 27, 2029 and the investors' full funding. None was outstanding at the year end, so the entire $2B remains available. Measured against a market capitalization of $8,310M, that is authority equal to 24% of the current equity value, exercisable at the company's election and convertible into common stock. Filed 10-K, Jul 29, 2026, and 8-K, Jun 26, 2026.

At-the-market program

A sales agreement dated June 2, 2025 with Northland Securities, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC allows up to $200,000,000 of common stock to be sold. As of May 31, 2026 the company had sold approximately 15.3 million shares under it for gross proceeds of approximately $196.4M, so the program is substantially exhausted. Filed 10-K, Jul 29, 2026. Northland Securities is also one of the twelve firms on Applied Digital's own analyst coverage list, which is taken up in section 8.

Debt

InstrumentPrincipalIssuer and purpose
6.750% senior secured notes due 2031$2.15BAPLD ComputeCo 2 LLC, issued at 98% of par. Funds 200 MW at Polaris Forge 2, Harwood, North Dakota.
7.000% senior secured notes due 2031$1.59BAPLD ComputeCo 3 LLC, issued at par. Repaid the $300M bridge and funds the 150 MW fourth building at Polaris Forge 1.
9.250% senior secured notes due 2030Not establishedSecured on the CoreWeave leases. Credit enhanced through a restructured special purpose subsidiary, springing guarantees from CoreWeave and a $50M letter of credit. Principal not read for this document.
Revolving credit facility$430M committedCredit agreement dated May 29, 2026 with First National Bank of Omaha and Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, arranged by Goldman Sachs, maturing May 2029. Originally $350M committed with a $200M accordion; upsized subsequent to the year end, with $120M of accordion remaining.
First National Bank of Omaha revolver$65MLoan and security agreement dated November 10, 2025 for revolving loans and letters of credit.
$300M senior secured bridgeRepaidLed by Goldman Sachs for the fourth building at Polaris Forge 1; repaid from the 7.000% notes.

Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026; 10-K, Jul 29, 2026; 8-K, Jun 26, 2026; 8-K, Jun 16, 2026.

Two features of this stack matter more than the coupons. The notes are issued at ring-fenced project subsidiaries rather than at the parent, which is standard for this kind of build and which determines where the recourse runs; the indentures were not read for this document, so nothing is asserted about that. And Goldman Sachs appears three times, as arranger of the revolver, as a lender under the credit agreement and as lead of the repaid bridge, without appearing on the company's analyst coverage list.

08Valuation

Multiples shown with their basis and pricing date. No target price.

MeasureValueBasis
Price to FY2026 revenue13.6×Estimate $8,310M market capitalization ÷ $611.3M FY2026 revenue. Price Aug 18, 2026, revenue for the year ended May 31, 2026.
Price to FY2026 adjusted revenue15.4×Estimate $8,310M ÷ $539.7M, the company's adjusted revenue excluding ChronoScale. Shown beside the row above because the two denominators describe different groups of assets.
Price to book4.82×Estimate $8,310M ÷ $1,724.5M total equity at May 31, 2026.
Market capitalization to FY2026 adjusted EBITDA77.5×Estimate $8,310M ÷ $107.2M. On a business where most contracted capacity is not yet operating, this multiple describes the past rather than the asset.
Market capitalization to contracted base-term revenue0.23×Estimate $8,310M ÷ approximately $36B of total contracted lease revenue. The denominator runs 15 years and is undiscounted, so this is a scale comparison rather than a valuation multiple, and it is shown because the company leads with the $36B figure.
Enterprise value multiplesn/aNot struck. See methodology: an enterprise value is not derived here.

Third-party coverage

Every row is market data: attributed, dated, tagged, never adopted. Price at publication is the close on the last trading day before the action, taken from the exchange's own daily record for APLD, and this convention governs every row in the table. Applied Digital's own investor relations page, read on August 5, 2026, names twelve firms and their analysts; it publishes no ratings or targets. Rows carrying a rating and a target are cited to the note that published them.

FirmAnalystDateRatingTargetPrice at pub.Disclosed conflict
Texas Capital SecuritiesDerrick Whitfield, with Nate Pendleton, John Annis and Nick ArmatoJul 27, 2026Buy$74.00 Market$27.19States it has received investment banking compensation from Applied Digital in the last twelve months and expects to seek more within three. Disclosed by the firm.
Compass Point ResearchMichael Donovan, Ed EngelJul 28, 2026Buy$70.00 Market$26.38Not established. The firm's disclosure page was not read.
Northland SecuritiesMike GrondahlJul 27, 2026Not establishedNot established$27.19Sales agent under the June 2025 at-the-market sales agreement, alongside Wells Fargo Securities. Filed 10-K, Jul 29, 2026
B. Riley SecuritiesNick GilesNot establishedNot establishedNot establishedn/aNot established
Citizens JMPGreg MillerNot establishedNot establishedNot establishedn/aNot established
Craig Hallum Capital GroupGeorge SuttonNot establishedNot establishedNot establishedn/aNot established
Freedom Capital MarketsPaul MeeksNot establishedNot establishedNot establishedn/aNot established
H.C. WainwrightKevin DedeNot establishedNot establishedNot establishedn/aNot established
Lake Street Capital MarketsRobert BrownNot establishedNot establishedNot establishedn/aNot established
Lucid Capital MarketsDarren AftahiNot establishedNot establishedNot establishedn/aNot established
Morgan StanleyStephen C. ByrdNot establishedNot establishedNot establishedn/aNot established
Needham & CompanyJohn TodaroNot establishedNot establishedNot establishedn/aNot established

The shape of the coverage

Twelve firms follow Applied Digital according to the company's own investor relations page, read on August 5, 2026. Three published actions are established here, all dated within two days of the fiscal year results on 27 July. Two carry targets, Texas Capital at $74 and Compass Point at $70, both Buy; the spread between them is $4, or 6% of the lower. The Northland action of 27 July is established as to firm, analyst and date but not as to rating or target. No published consensus figure is reported here, because none was retrieved from a source that attributes and dates it; the count used here is a floor rather than a current figure.

Two selling relationships are established from documents rather than assumed. Northland Securities, which covers the company, is also one of the two sales agents under the June 2025 at-the-market program through which roughly $196.4M of stock has been sold. Texas Capital Securities discloses on its own note that it has received investment banking compensation from Applied Digital in the last twelve months and expects to seek more within three. Those are different kinds of relationship: one is a standing selling agency disclosed in the issuer's annual report, the other a banking relationship disclosed by the firm.

The distribution is worth stating rather than any single point in it. Of the two established targets, the higher comes from the firm with the disclosed banking relationship and the lower from a firm whose disclosures were not read; the covering firm with the standing selling agency published no target this document could establish. A banking or selling relationship therefore appears at the top of the established range and at the abstention, and on this evidence it does not sort the views. That characterisation rests on three of twelve firms, and completing the other nine could withdraw it.

The other selling relationship in this company's financings does not appear in the coverage set at all. Goldman Sachs arranged the revolving credit facility, is a lender under the May 29, 2026 credit agreement and led the repaid $300M bridge, and does not cover the stock. Wells Fargo Securities is the other at-the-market sales agent and does not cover it either. What each of the nine unexamined firms discloses about this issuer is not established here.

09Growth drivers

Ranked by size and by how settleable each is from a document.

Delivering the contracted 1.4 GW

Almost the whole investment case is the conversion of approximately $36B of contracted base-term lease revenue into operating capacity. The schedule the company states is: Delta Forge 1 and Polaris Forge 3 beginning operations in calendar 2027, and Delta Forge 2 in the first half of calendar 2028. Polaris Forge 1 is already partly in service at 175 MW. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

The fourth building at Polaris Forge 1, and the CoreWeave assignment

This report has described how the campuses are funded without naming an arrangement that sits ahead of the common equity. The company's investor presentation of June 2026, at pages 55 to 58, sets out a Macquarie Asset Management investment through a named issuer, APLD HPC TopCo 2 LLC: a 15% common equity interest in APLD HPC Holdings, at least $225M funded at closing, $2.25M of availability per contracted megawatt, and perpetual preferred at 12.75% PIK stepping to a 16.75% cap, with a 1.8x MOIC liquidation floor, force-redemption after year seven and a governance step-in right. Filed Neither this report nor the calendar mentioned it. A preferred that accrues in kind at 12.75% and steps to 16.75%, floored at 1.8 times money and redeemable at the holder's instance from year seven, is a claim ahead of the shareholder that compounds whether or not the build performs, so the equity value in section 5 is struck before it. The figures are the issuer's own statement of an executed arrangement and no filing read for this document set them out.

The 150 MW fourth building is funded by the $1.59B of 7.000% notes. Separately, Applied Digital has entered a memorandum of understanding with CoreWeave to assign the Building 4 lease to a CoreWeave subsidiary upon that subsidiary achieving an investment-grade credit rating. That is a conditional improvement in counterparty quality with an observable trigger. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

Marketing the further 1.7 GW

The company states it is actively marketing an additional 1.7 GW across multiple states, beyond the contracted portfolio and the roughly 1.4 GW under construction. No lease, tenant or revenue figure attaches to it. On the record of the last year, in which three leases with one hyperscaler were signed in a few months, this is the driver with the widest range of outcomes. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

Owned generation through Base Electron

Approximately 1.2 GW of front-of-the-meter natural gas-fired generation in the Dakotas is being developed by Base Electron Corp., which has engaged Babcock & Wilcox, in collaboration with regional utilities. If it is delivered it converts a queue dependency into a supply the company has an interest in. No commissioning date is disclosed. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

The hosting business as a cash contributor

The chief executive describes the 286 MW data center hosting business as the highest return-on-assets business in the company, paid on capacity provided rather than on mining output. It is not a growth driver in size but it is a source of cash that does not depend on the AI build completing. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

10Risks

Severity-ranked, most severe first.

An unnamed counterparty behind $20 billion of contracted revenue Severe

Three of the five campus leases, 810 MW and roughly $20B of base-term revenue, are with a single customer Applied Digital describes only as a high investment-grade hyperscaler. The company states the credit quality; it does not name the entity, and a reader cannot assess the credit independently, check its capital commitments elsewhere, or judge the concentration that customer itself carries. Take-or-pay protects against non-use, not against non-performance. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

$3.74 billion of new secured notes against capacity operating in 2027 and 2028 Severe

The 6.750% notes of $2.15B and the 7.000% notes of $1.59B were issued to fund builds whose first operations are stated for calendar 2027, with Delta Forge 2 in the first half of 2028. Interest accrues now. Total liabilities reached $6,185.7M at May 31, 2026 from $1,236.4M a year earlier, against equity of $1,724.5M. A construction or interconnection delay lengthens the period over which the coupon is paid from capital rather than from rent. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026 and 10-K, Jul 29, 2026.

Most of the balance-sheet cash is not available Severe

Restricted cash of $2,381.0M exceeds unrestricted cash of $1,592.0M at May 31, 2026. The restricted balance is construction proceeds held in controlled accounts. A liquidity assessment that sums the two overstates the company's flexibility by more than $2.3B, and the restricted balance is committed to the very builds whose delay would create the need for liquidity. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

$2 billion of preferred authority available at the company's election Moderate

The preferred equity purchase agreement of April 30, 2025 permits issuance of up to $2B of Series G convertible preferred stock through August 27, 2029, and none was outstanding at the year end, so the whole facility is available. That is authority equal to 22% of the current market capitalization, convertible into common stock, drawable without a further shareholder vote. The at-the-market program, by contrast, is substantially exhausted at roughly $196.4M of $200M. Filed 10-K, Jul 29, 2026.

Two accounting bases for one company Moderate

ChronoScale is 96% owned and consolidated, and excluded from every non-GAAP measure the company presents. FY2026 reported revenue is $611.3M and adjusted revenue $539.7M; reported net loss to common is $249.2M and adjusted net income is $36.1M. Both sets are properly labeled by the company, but a reader who mixes them will reach a figure that describes no entity. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.

Twenty-eight percent share growth in one year Moderate

Shares outstanding rose from 224,909,669 to 287,883,603 during FY2026, and to 291,469,112 by July 28, 2026. The per-share loss narrowed 22% while the absolute loss deepened 7%, which is arithmetic rather than improvement. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026 and 10-K, Jul 29, 2026.

Three notifications of late annual filing in the company's record Lower

Seven notifications of late filing appear across the 812 filings indexed under this CIK, three on Form NT 10-K and four on Form NT 10-Q. The most recent is an NT 10-K filed August 30, 2024 for the year ended May 31, 2024, and the 10-K itself was filed the same day, so the report arrived within the grace period. Four of the seven date from the predecessor Flight Safety Technologies era before 2009. The record is not clean but the recent instance resolved immediately. Filed SEC filing index for CIK 0001144879, searched Aug 5, 2026.

11Bull / base / bear

Each case with its preconditions: what must be true, not what might be.

Bear

A campus slips, the coupon on $3.74B of notes is paid from capital for longer than planned, and the $2B preferred facility is drawn to bridge it. The unnamed hyperscaler reduces or reschedules commitments and take-or-pay is tested rather than relied on. Reported losses deepen while the share count keeps rising.

Requires: a delivery delay at Delta Forge 1 or Polaris Forge 3, a drawdown under the preferred facility, or any disclosed change to the hyperscaler leases.

Base

Polaris Forge 1 continues to scale past 175 MW, Delta Forge 1 and Polaris Forge 3 begin operations in calendar 2027 broadly on schedule, and the hosting business keeps contributing cash. Revenue grows steeply as capacity energises, the reported loss persists while interest runs ahead of rent, and adjusted EBITDA keeps climbing from $107.2M.

Requires: no material construction or interconnection delay, no drawdown that changes the capital structure, and the hyperscaler leases performing as written.

Bull

The franchise model proves repeatable across five campuses, part of the additional 1.7 GW under marketing is contracted on similar terms, the CoreWeave Building 4 assignment completes on an investment-grade rating, and Base Electron delivers generation that removes the grid dependency. Contracted revenue is re-read as an annuity rather than as a construction risk.

Requires: at least one new lease from the 1.7 GW marketed, the Building 4 assignment completing, and Delta Forge 1 delivering on time.

12Research summary

Applied Digital has contracted more AI data center capacity than any company in this coverage set: 1.4 GW of critical IT load, approximately $36B of base-term lease revenue, and approximately $86B if every renewal is exercised. It has also, in one fiscal year, taken total liabilities from $1,236.4M to $6,185.7M, raised $3.74B of project-level secured notes, and reported a net loss to common stockholders of $249.2M.

The company is therefore a construction risk wearing a contracted-revenue coat, and both halves of that description are accurate. The contracts are real, long, take-or-pay and with stated investment-grade counterparties. The revenue from them mostly begins in calendar 2027. Between now and then the interest is paid and the buildings are built, and the only completed evidence that the company can do this is Polaris Forge 1, where the first 100 MW came online on schedule and live capacity has reached 175 MW.

Two disclosure features shape how much a reader can check. The customer behind roughly $20B of the contracted book is not named, so its credit cannot be independently assessed. And the company presents two accounting bases, one including the 96%-owned ChronoScale and one excluding it, which produce a $249.2M loss and $36.1M of adjusted net income for the same year.

Three things would move the reading and each is settleable from a document: whether Delta Forge 1 or Polaris Forge 3 begins operations within calendar 2027; whether any part of the marketed 1.7 GW is contracted; and whether the Series G preferred facility is drawn. What this document could not establish is set out in section 14, and includes the terms of the indentures, the identity of the hyperscaler, and nine of the twelve covering firms' published views.

13Null categories

Requested categories with nothing to report. Status reads Covered above, None where a named source was checked and found empty, or Not established where the category was not examined. A category nobody looked at is a gap, not an absence.

CategoryStatusBasis
DividendsNoneNo common dividend has been declared or paid. None appears across the 812 filings the index holds for CIK 0001144879, searched Aug 12, 2026.
Insider transaction filingsCovered above267 insider filings across the index for CIK 0001144879, being 205 Forms 4, 34 Forms 144, 26 Forms 3 and 2 Forms 5, from November 9, 2001 to August 6, 2026 with 34 in 2026. The week of August 4 runs both ways: four Forms 4 of August 4 report awards of approximately 3,045,000 shares across four insiders, 1,600,000 of them to the Chairman and Chief Executive, with roughly 1,222,000 shares withheld for tax at $27.39; a single Form 4 of August 6 reports the only sale, 75,000 shares at $31.15 by a director, leaving 133,378. Against 291,469,112 shares outstanding the awards are roughly 1% and the sale is immaterial to the count, so the dilution reading rests on the awards. Filed Forms 3, 4, 5 and 144 enumerated across the complete index, searched August 12, 2026.
Share buybacksNoneNo repurchase program is disclosed. Treasury stock of 7,165,300 shares at May 31, 2026 fell from 9,291,199 a year earlier, so shares left treasury during the year rather than entering it. Filed 8-K, Jul 27, 2026.
Analyst coverageCovered aboveTwelve firms named in section 8, from the issuer's own coverage page read Aug 5, 2026, with three established actions and two established targets.
Securities class actionNot establishedCourt dockets were not searched. Also named in what was not checked.
Delinquent filings (Form NT)Covered aboveSeven exist and are described in section 10: three on Form NT 10-K and four on Form NT 10-Q across the 812 filings indexed under CIK 0001144879, most recently Aug 30, 2024. Searched Aug 12, 2026.
Transition period reportingNoneNo Form 10-KT appears in the index. Every annual report since the year ended May 31, 2003 covers a 31 May year end, so no comparative column in the current filings is a stub period. Searched Aug 5, 2026.
Register filings the issuer made about othersCovered aboveTwo of the 56 Schedule 13D and 13G filings indexed under this CIK run outbound: a Schedule 13D of May 12, 2026 and an amendment of June 26, 2026, both filed by Applied Digital about ChronoScale Corp, CIK 0001549084. The remaining 54 name Applied Digital as the subject. Established by reading the subject and filer of each. Searched Aug 5, 2026.
Credit rating actionsNot establishedNo rating agency action was sought or read, though the secured notes are rated instruments by their nature and the company refers to CoreWeave's A3 rating. Also named in what was not checked.
Index membershipNot establishedIndex provider announcements were not checked. Also named in what was not checked.
Short interestNot establishedNo exchange short interest report was retrieved. Also named in what was not checked.
Predecessor entity filingsCovered aboveThe CIK is continuous through four former names, most recently Applied Blockchain, Inc. and before that Flight Safety Technologies, Inc. A Form 25-NSE of Nov 12, 2008 and a Form 15-12G of Jul 29, 2009 record the delisting and deregistration of the predecessor's common stock. Searched Aug 5, 2026.

14Methodology & sources

Pricing basis, the tagging scheme, and, importantly, what was not checked.

Provenance tags

TagWhat it asserts
FiledStated in an SEC filing or company release, cited by form and date. Also covers a dated official publication by a named non-SEC issuer, with the issuer named in the source line.
EstimateDerived or inferred here. The arithmetic is shown.
OpenExpected but unconfirmed. Nothing filed either way.
MarketPrice, volume, float, published targets and ratings, stamped with the close or publication date. A third party's target or rating is market data, attributed to the firm that issued it and never adopted here.
PressReported by a named publication that is neither the issuer nor an analyst, cited by outlet and date. Corroborates; never the sole basis for a material claim.
SocialPublicly posted by a named account, cited by handle and date. Asserts that the statement was made, never that it is true.

Pricing basis and the fiscal year

Every market figure in this document is struck on the close of August 18, 2026, at which APLD closed at $28.51 on volume of 18,093,170 shares. The document is stamped August 19, 2026, the following day, because the 19 August session had not closed when the figures were taken. An earlier version of this paragraph stated the stamp as August 5, 2026, which was the date the body was written; the masthead had since moved to August 12 without it, so the sentence described an overnight gap where eight days stood. That is the defect this revision closes, and the gap it describes is again a single night. The trading calendar behind the coverage table is derived from the exchange's own daily record for APLD over 253 sessions from August 1, 2025 to August 4, 2026. That window was not extended for this revision, so it establishes trading days to 4 August and nothing after it; the 18 August close is taken from the daily record directly and agrees to the cent with a second quote source on all seventeen overlapping sessions tested.

Applied Digital's fiscal year ends on 31 May, established from the filings rather than assumed: the annual report for the year ended May 31, 2026 was filed on July 29, 2026, and every annual report indexed under this CIK since the year ended May 31, 2003 carries a 31 May period end. No transition report on Form 10-KT appears in the index, so no comparative column in the current filings covers a stub period. References here to FY4Q26 mean the three months from March to May 2026.

Sources

Primary sources are the filings indexed under Central Index Key 0001144879, swept on August 12, 2026. The index holds 812 filings dated August 9, 2001 to August 6, 2026 and reports no overflow file, so the whole record under this CIK was available to the sweep. Every form family was enumerated before filtering, and register filings were matched on both the current and legacy spellings of the Schedule 13D and 13G form strings, which is what took the register count from 23 to 56. Each register filing was read to establish its direction. The principal documents are the 8-K of July 27, 2026 with the fiscal fourth quarter and full year results as Exhibit 99.1, the 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2026 filed July 29, 2026, and the 8-Ks of June 16 and 26, 2026 on the financings. Applied Digital's investor relations coverage page was read on August 5, 2026. Three research notes, from Texas Capital Securities and Northland Securities dated July 27, 2026 and Compass Point dated July 28, 2026, are the source of the ratings, targets, dates and the one disclosed conflict in section 8 and of nothing else in this document.

Open review

Whether the credit-quality characterisations carried here are filed facts or market data is not decided in this revision. Two items are affected. Applied Digital describes the customer behind three of the five campus leases as a high investment-grade hyperscaler and does not name it, and it describes the CoreWeave refinancing that supports the enhanced credit terms as investment-grade and A3-rated. Both are carried as filed. Two readings of the tagging scheme are available and this document does not choose between them. Each statement is made in a company filing, and a company filing is a filed source; each is also an unnamed agency's characterisation of a third party restated by the issuer, and a third party's characterisation of someone else's facts is market data.

What is recorded so the next revision can decide rather than inherit: the surfaces are a Framing item, a data table Basis column and a risk entry, each of which requires a tag; the tag now carried is filed; the competing tag is market; no rating agency is named in any filing read, so no rating body can be cited either way; and the same question governs the hyperscaler characterisation wherever it appears. Nothing is retagged in this revision.

What was not checked

An unexamined area is a gap, not a clean bill. The following were not reached.

15Document log

Newest first. The original build entry is never removed or rewritten.

August 20, 2026 Latest
Investor presentation of June 2026 read · basis unchanged, priced off Aug 18, 2026 close · not repriced
Correction

An entire financing arrangement was missing from this report. The company's own investor presentation of June 2026 devotes pages 55 to 58 to a Macquarie Asset Management investment: a 15% common equity interest in APLD HPC Holdings through APLD HPC TopCo 2 LLC, at least $225M funded at closing, $2.25M of availability per contracted megawatt, and perpetual preferred at 12.75% PIK stepping to a 16.75% cap, with a 1.8x MOIC liquidation floor, force-redemption after year seven and a governance step-in right. The word Macquarie did not appear anywhere in either deliverable. Section 7 now carries the arrangement. Nothing in the valuation is restruck here: what changes is that a reader can see there is a compounding claim ahead of the common equity, which the section 5 figures are struck before.

The presentation predates this file by about two months. It is dated June 2026 and this report was built on August 19. Nothing here is newer information; it was available and was not read. The as-of does not move and nothing is repriced.

August 19, 2026
One vantage restored · capitalization reconciled · priced off Aug 18, 2026 close · $28.51 · $8,310M cap
Correction

This document said it was stamped August 5, 2026 while its masthead said August 12. Section 14 carried the sentence in those words, and explained the difference between the pricing session and the stamp as an unsettled overnight session. Eight days stood between them, not one night. A restamp had moved the title, the masthead and the footer and left the body describing the day it was written. Measured across the whole set, three files state their own stamp and this was the only one that disagreed with its own masthead. Filed

Correction

The market capitalization did not follow from its own stated inputs. The snapshot shows the arithmetic on its face, 291,469,112 shares at $31.27, and that product is $9,114,239,132. The file carried $9,113M, short by $1,239,132. Every multiple in the valuation section reproduced from 9,113 rather than from the count and the price, so the document was consistent on a figure that did not follow from its inputs. The restruck figure is shown to the dollar so the reconciliation can be checked rather than asserted. Filed

Repriced to the 18 August close. $31.27 → $28.51, a fall of 8.83%, and the market capitalization $9,113M → $8,310M on the unchanged filed count of 291,469,112, which reconciles at $8,309,784,383. Every multiple moves with it: price to FY2026 revenue 14.9 → 13.6 times, to adjusted revenue 16.9 → 15.4, to book 5.28 → 4.82, capitalization to adjusted EBITDA 85.0 → 77.5, and to contracted base-term revenue 0.25 → 0.23. The Series G authority rises from 22% to 24% of the equity value because the denominator fell. The gap between the share count date and the pricing date restates from seven days to twenty-one.

The record did not move, and this revision does not pretend it did. Nothing has been filed since August 6, 2026 and the investor relations feed carries nothing newer than the previous stamp, both read on August 19. No new matter is absorbed, no catalyst resolves, and the share count is unchanged at the 10-K cover figure of July 28, 2026. The 253-session window behind the coverage table was not extended and now says so. Filed

August 12, 2026
Priced off Aug 4, 2026 close · no figure moved

Insider transaction filings are now a tracked null category. This report did not carry the category. Enumerated across the complete index: 267 insider filings, being 205 Forms 4, 34 Forms 144, 26 Forms 3 and 2 Forms 5, from November 9, 2001 to August 6, 2026, with 34 in 2026.

The awards are the material half and the sale is not. Four Forms 4 of August 4 report approximately 3,045,000 shares acquired across four insiders, 1,600,000 of them to the Chairman and Chief Executive, with roughly 1,222,000 withheld for tax at $27.39. One Form 4 of August 6 reports a sale of 75,000 shares at $31.15 by a director, leaving 133,378. Against 291,469,112 shares outstanding the awards are roughly 1% of the count; the sale is immaterial to it and is recorded because a register that reports only what it likes is not a register.

The sweep is restated at 812 filings to August 6, 2026 against 811 to August 4. No figure elsewhere in this report moves and the price was not restruck: the basis stays at the August 4, 2026 close.

August 5, 2026
Priced off Aug 4, 2026 close · $31.27 · $9,113M cap

Original build. Built from Applied Digital's fiscal fourth quarter and full year 2026 results, released July 27, 2026 as a Form 8-K under Items 2.02 and 9.01 with the earnings release as Exhibit 99.1; from the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2026, filed July 29, 2026; from the 8-Ks of June 16, 2026 and June 26, 2026 covering the notes offering, the credit agreement of May 29, 2026 and the Series G preferred arrangements; from the complete filing index for Central Index Key 0001144879, 811 filings from August 9, 2001 to August 4, 2026 with no overflow file, with each of the 56 register filings read to establish whether it runs inbound or outbound; and from Applied Digital's own investor relations coverage page read on August 5, 2026.

Pricing basis fixed at the August 4, 2026 close of $31.27. The document is stamped 5 August because the 5 August session had not settled: Nasdaq reported the market pre-open with 4 August as the previous trading date, so the previous close remains the basis.

Conventions fixed at construction: the fiscal year ends 31 May, established from the filings rather than from the calendar, so FY2026 covers June 2025 to May 2026 and FY4Q26 covers March to May 2026; reported and adjusted figures are always labeled, because the adjusted set excludes the 96%-owned ChronoScale and the two therefore describe different groups of assets; and price at publication in the coverage table is the close on the last trading day before each action, stated once above the table.

One divergence is recorded rather than smoothed. Texas Capital's note of 27 July states a price of $26.38, which is the 27 July close itself rather than the close on the last trading day before it. Under the convention this table uses, the price at publication for that action is the 24 July close of $27.19, and that is the figure shown. Compass Point's note of 28 July also states $26.38, which on that date is the prior-session close and is consistent with the convention used here. The same number therefore appears on two notes describing two different sessions, and the table resolves it by deriving every row from the exchange record rather than from the note headers.

Known gaps at this version: no enterprise value is derived, and the masthead field is omitted rather than filled; the note indentures were not read; the hyperscaler behind three leases is not named by the company and was not established; court dockets, interconnection and permitting records, credit rating actions, index membership and short interest were not reached; ChronoScale was not examined as an issuer in its own right; and nine of the twelve covering firms carry no established rating or target, with only Texas Capital's disclosure read.